As an organization dedicated to supporting individuals affected by brain injury, we believe it is crucial to provide a balanced perspective on these developments.
First and foremost, brain-computer interfaces are not a new concept. Electrical brain stimulation via implanted electrodes to restore lost function after brain injury has been researched and trialled for over three decades, albeit with varying degrees of success.
Perhaps what holds most promise today, is the funding for companies like Neuralink and others as well as efforts to apply modern technology and approaches to existing techniques. For example, advancements such as minimally invasive electrode placement and the integration of artificial intelligence (AI) for learning purposes show potential in making these technologies more practical.
Though these technologies hold promise, it is crucial to have realistic expectations and understand that this work is firmly in the developmental stage and unlikely to become mainstream anytime soon.
Research is still needed to clarify exactly who would benefit from the new technology, specifically what conditions it helps alleviate as well as studying potential side effects and the longer-term consequences of having a device implanted in the brain.
Brain injury is a hugely varied condition, and it is imperative that brain injury survivors do not perceive these technological developments as a ‘miracle cure’ for all symptoms and effects. Ultimately, it is essential that the public understands the current limitations and real capabilities of brain-computer interfaces.
The Royal Society's call for increased public and governmental involvement in discussions surrounding the development of such technology is a stance that we fully support. Ethical considerations, including issues related to privacy, autonomy, human rights, and equality of access, must be carefully addressed as these technologies continue to evolve.
In conclusion, while we recognise the potential of brain-computer interfaces to improve the lives of brain injury survivors, we urge caution and emphasise the need for responsible development and implementation.
We remain committed to advocating for the well-being and rights of brain injury survivors and will continue to monitor and engage in discussions surrounding emerging technologies in this field.
Back